WILSON
V.
BROBBEY

OSEI-HWERE J.

This appeal arose as the result of the judgment delivered in the plaintiff-respondent’s favour by the District Magistrate Grade I, Sunyani. In the court below the plaintiff made a very simple claim against the defendant-appellant (hereinafter called the defendant) for the sum of ¢231.00 being the value of store goods credited by the defendant from the plaintiff. At the trial the plaintiff supported his claim with an invoice on the goods which the defendant had signed. Although the defendant admitted that he signed the invoice on the goods yet he contended that he did so merely as a guarantor on behalf of one F. L. Andoh who really credited the goods. The trial magistrate found that exhibit A spoke for itself in that the defendant signed it as a purchaser and not as a guarantor. He arrived at a conclusion as to how the defendant came to sign exhibit A and he ultimately gave judgment for the plaintiff on the strength of the “oral testimony coupled with exhibit A.” It is ag…