SALIHU MODIBBO ALFA BELGORE JSC
MICHAEL EKUNDAYO OGUNDARE JSC
UTHMAN MOHAMMED JSC
ANTHONY IKECHUKWU IGUH JSC
GODFREY OKAY ACHIKE JSC
SAMSON ODEMWINGIE UWAIFO JSC
AKINTOLA OLUFEMI EJIWUNMI JSC
Upgrade required to show details
The respondent, who was the applicant in the High Court, brought an action for the enforcement of his fundamental rights following his arrest and detention by officials of the State Security Service. The High Court dismissed the application on the ground that its jurisdiction was ousted by Decree No. 2 of 1984.
Aggrieved, the respondent appealed to the Court of Appeal which held, in the main, that the jurisdiction of the Court was indeed ousted, but held that the African Charter on Human and People's Rights (enacted as Cap. 10 of the Laws of the Federation, 1990) was still in force as the military government could not contract out of the provisions of the treaty.
In this appeal to the Supreme Court, the Court, by a majority four to three, dismissed the appeal while allowing the cross-appeal of the respondent. The Supreme Court, like the Court of Appeal, upheld the validity and continued application of the African Charter on Human and People's Rights, but overruled the Court of Appeal on the point of ouster of jurisdiction. The Court also made far-reaching submissions on the status of the African Charter on Humans and People's Rights, including the mode of enforcement of rights contained therein.
Finally, the apex court ordered a retrial of the case in the High Court.
Core Terms Beta
federal high court
laws of federation of nigeria
court of appeal
operatives of the state security service
federal military government
jurisdiction of this honourable court
provisions of any decree
aforementioned decree no.2
learned trial judge
issue of the consequences of the detention
facts of this case
inspector-general of police
constitution of the federal republic of nigeria
detention of persons
continued detention of the applicant
powers decree no.
state security service
order of mandamus
laws of the federation
provisions of chapter iv
detention order no.
detention of the applicant chief gani fawehinmi
arrest of the applicant
further elucidation of the issues
chief gani fawehinmi
time of his arrest
respect of any action
parts of the judgment of the court
MICHAEL EKUNDAYO OGUNDARE, JSC (Delivering the Leading Judgment): The facts of this case are simple enough. The respondent, a legal practitioner, was arrested without warrant at his residence on Tuesday January 30, 1996 at about 6 a.m., by six men who identified themselves as operatives of the State Security Service (hereinafter is referred to as SSS) and policemen, and taken away to the office of the SSS at Shangisha where he was detained. At the time of his arrest the respondent was not informed of, nor charged with, any offence. He was later detained at the Bauchi prisons. In consequence, he applied ex-parte through his counsel, to the Federal High Court, Lagos pursuant to the Fundamental Rights (Enforcement Procedure) Rules 1979 for the following reliefs against the 4 respondents who are now appellants before us and shall hereinafter be referred to as appellants:-
1. A declaration that the arrest of the applicant, Chief Gani Fawehinmi at his residence at 9A Ademola Close GRA, Ikeja…
There's more. Sign in to continue reading.
judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 20,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.