BUDU II
V.
CAESAR & ORS.

(1959) JELR 69709 (HC)

High Court 26 Nov 1959 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The court held that there was no binding customary law arbitration between the plaintiff and the Caesar family; the purported proceedings were negotiations for settlement, not arbitration, lacking voluntary submission, agreement to be bou

Case Details

Judges:OLLENNU J.
Counsel:DE GRAFT JOHNSON FOR THE PLAINTIFF; OHENE AMPOFO FOR THE 1ST THREE DEFENDANTS AND CO-DEFENDANT.,PUPLAMPU FOR THE 4TH DEFENDANT.
Other Citations:[1959] GLR 410, [1959] GLR 410 - 433

OLLENNU J.

(His lordship set forth the history of the proceedings, and continued:—)

I shall deal firstly with the issue whether or not there has been a valid arbitration upon the dispute between the plaintiff and the Caesar family so as to operate as a estoppel against the Caesar family.

It is not very material by what name the layman calls proceedings which in the eyes of the law amount to a binding arbitration—he may call it arbitration or settlement. Whether any particular proceedings constitute arbitration or negotiations for a settlement is a question of law, to be decided by the Court upon the evidence before it. In the case of arbitration, the award is binding upon the parties to it whether or not they accept it; the parties cannot resile after the award has been published. In the case of proceedings in the nature of negotiation for settlement of a dispute, the decision becomes binding only after it has been accepted by the parties, and not otherwise (see Gyeniwa v. Mumah (W.A.C.A…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 20,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.