T. T. NARTEY
V.
GODWIN GATI

(2010) JELR 68100 (SC)

Supreme Court 7 Jul 2010 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The Supreme Court held that section 30 of the Legal Profession Act, 1960 (Act 32)—requiring lawyers to serve clients with a bill of fees at least one month before commencing recovery proceedings—is not inconsistent with Article 17(1) of t

Case Details

Suit Number:REFERENCE NO. J6/1/2010
Judges:AKUFFO (MS) JSC (PRESIDING), BROBBEY JSC, DR. DATE-BAH JSC, ANSAH JSC, OWUSU (MS) JSC, DOTSE JSC, YEBOAH JSC, BAFFOE-BONNIE JSC, GBADEGBE JSC
Counsel:T.T. NARTEY REPRESENTING HIMSELF; W. L. ANTHONIO FOR THE DEFENDANT

RULING

DR. DATE-BAH, JSC: This is the unanimous ruling of the Court on this reference.

Introduction

His Worship Ali Baba Abature, the Magistrate who has in this case made a reference to this Court, has exhibited commendable legal awareness. This is the first reference that we are aware of that has come from a Magistrate’s Court. He is, of course, well within his rights, under article 130(2) of the 1992 Constitution, to refer to this court:

“(a) all matters relating to the enforcement or interpretation of this Constitution; and
(b) all matters arising as to whether an enactment was made in excess of the powers conferred on Parliament or any authority or person by law or under this Constitution.”

The context within which this Court will exercise its original jurisdiction, whether by way of a reference or otherwise, was set out lucidly by Anin JA in the locus classicus in Republic v. Special Tribunal; Ex parte Akosah [1980] GLR 592 at p. 604 as follows (in relation to the 1979 Constitution):

“F…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 20,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.