Subject Matter Index

Browse cases by legal subject matter and principles

Effect of absence of cross-examination and address by parties on the additional evidence adduced at the locus in quo

Effect of absence of the accused person at the locus

Effect of admissibility of a locus inspection report without giving the parties the opportunity to cross examine the registrar of the court and his team who visited the locus

Effect of a locus inspection by the Registrar of the court and admission of the inspection report

Effect of a visit to locus in quo carried out after judgment has been reserved

Effect of evidence wrongly obtained at locus in quo

Effect of failure of the court to ensure that what was observed in the locus visit is captured and tendered as exhibits

Effect of failure to comply with the procedure governing visits to locus in quo

Effect of failure to give evidence of locus inspection in court

How evidence received at the locus should be treated

Methods of visit to locus in quo

Position of the law on giving evidence at the locus in quo

Principles governing visit to locus in quo

Procedure for visit to locus in quo

Purpose of a visit to locus in quo

The basis for a visit to the locus in quo

The position of the law on the power of the court to visit a locus in quo

The primary purpose of a visit to the locus

Whether a Judge can put his view at a locus in quo in place of evidence

Whether a locus inspection must be carried out before the close of the case for both the plaintiff and the defendant

Whether an appellate court will interfere with the findings of a trial court where it fails to comply with technicalities during inspection at the locus in quo

Whether a party who did not apply for the court to undertake a visit to the locus in quo can, on appeal, accuse the learned trial Judge of refusing to undertake the visit

Whether a report of inspection should always be recorded as part of the proceedings when a Native Court inspects the subject-matter of a suit

Whether a trial Judge can reject locus proceedings without giving reasons for the rejection

Whether a trial judge can treat his perception at the locus in quo as a finding of fact

Whether a trial Judge can undertake a visit to the locus in quo to enable him strengthen his resolve and confirm his fears about the credibility of the testimonies of witnesses

Whether a visit to a locus in quo is meant to repair a damage in a party's case

Whether a visit to locus in quo is sine qua non

Whether a visit to the locus in quo can be delegated

Whether evidence given at a locus is admissible without recalling the witnesses into the witness-box for cross-examination

Whether evidence of a locus inspection should precede the conclusion of evidence and final addresses

Whether failure of a trial judge to visit the locus in quo is fatal to its decision

Whether failure to have witnesses at the locs re-swear to narrate their evidence in court is fatal

Whether locus inspection can be carried out by assessors

Whether the court can suo motu undertake a visit to locus in quo

Whether the court can use the result of its own observation at the locus unsupported by evidence to form the basis of his judgment

Whether the court must visit the locus in quo to resolve conflicting evidence on title to land

Whether the Judge can base his decision on the impression from the locus

Whether the Judge must record the full details of his visit to the locus

Whether the proceedings conducted by a Court upon its visit to a locus in quo is impeachable merely upon technical objection

Whether there is a need for parties to mount the witness box to testify where there were no witnesses at the locus inspection

Whether there is need for oath taking and cross-examination at the locus

Whether there must be a record of notes taken by the trial Judge at the locus inspection

Whether the trial judge is required to visit the locus where there is conflict in the evidence of the parties

Access More on judy.legal

Get related cases, follow principles for updates, and access AI-powered research.

Explore judy.legal