Subject Matter Index

Browse cases by legal subject matter and principles

Burden on an applicant who relies on exceptional circumstances as the ground for review

Effect of failure an applicant to file his statement of case along with his motion for review

Grounds for the review of a judgment of the Supreme Court

Instances where the judgment of the Supreme Court can be reviewed

Instances where the Supreme Court will admit new evidence in an application for review

Instances where the Supreme Court will decline to review its judgment

Rationale behind the power of the Supreme Court to review its judgment

The exception to the rule that the Supreme Court cannot review its judgment

The only ground for a review of a judgment of the Supreme Court

The rule that the power of review of a judgment of the Supreme Court is limited to correcting any clerical mistake or some error arising from any accidental slip or omission or to vary its judgment or order so as to give effect to its meaning on intention

The standard of proof required to be achieved for the Supreme Court to review its judgment

The test for granting review applications

What an applicant for a review who alleges that there has been a fundamental error which has led to a gross miscarriage of justice must establish

What an applicant for review must show

What an applicant for the review of the judgment of the Supreme Court must show

What constitutes exceptional circumstances for invoking the review jurisdiction and how the burden can be discharged

What constitutes exceptional circumstances for the review of a Supreme Court's judgment

What is required in an application for review under rule 54(b) of CI 16

What must be satisfied in an application for the review of the judgment of the Supreme Court under Rule 54(a) of the Supreme Court Rules, 1996 (CI 16)

When a judgment will be reviewed by the Supreme Court

Whether a clarificatory decision of the ordinary bench qualifies for review by the Supreme Court

Whether an applicant for review will be allowed to raise a new issue for the first time after the consideration of the appeal by the ordinary bench of the Supreme Court

Whether a review application can be used as an occasion for repeating an appeal with new arguments or for putting a new variation on an old theme

Whether a review application is an appeal

Whether a review application is an opportunity for the losing party in the Supreme Court to have another bite of the cherry

Whether a review application is available to a party as of right simply because he disagrees with the decision of the ordinary bench

Whether a review application is one for the re-arguing of issues

Whether every application for the review of the judgment of the Supreme Court must be heard

Whether it is permissible to an Applicant to refer copiously again to the proceedings before the trial High Court and the Court of Appeal in a review application

Whether late receipt of the copies of the judgment justifies an applicant’s failure to file a statement of his case

Whether the fact that a decision was the product of very serious inadequate consideration of the case presented constitutes a ground for review

Whether the failure of an ordinary bench of the Supreme court to accede to the points of law canvassed before it automatically entitles an applicant to apply for a review of a decision given against him

Whether the judgment of the Supreme Court can be reviewed

Whether there is a right of review and how it can be taken away

Whether the rules of court committee can remove the right of review

Whether the statement of case accompanying a review application must be signed or else be declared a nullity

Whether the Supreme Court can sit on appeal over its own judgment

Whether the Supreme Court has the power to review its judgment

Access More on judy.legal

Get related cases, follow principles for updates, and access AI-powered research.

Explore judy.legal