Subject Matter Index

Browse cases by legal subject matter and principles

Circumstances under which the Supreme Court will exercise its supervisory jurisdiction

Circumstances under which time will begin to run for the purposes of invocation of the Supreme Court's supervisory jurisdiction

Courts in respect of which the Supreme Court can exercise its supervisory jurisdiction

Grounds for invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court

How the supervisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court should be exercised

Nature of errors which will warrant the exercise of the supervisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court

Principles for determining the date on which the grounds for an application to invoke the Supreme Court's supervisory jurisdiction will be said to have arisen for the first time

Principles upon which the Supreme Court exercises its supervisory jurisdiction

Scope of the supervisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court

The nature of the supervisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court

The principle that the reliefs open to a party who invokes the supervisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is not limited to the traditional prerogative writs

The remedies available to an applicant who invokes the supervisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court

The rule that a ground for invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is where there is a patent error of law on the face of the record

The rule that where the error of law committed by the court amounts to violation of a provision of a statute or the Constitution, the supervisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court will be exercised

Time within which an applicant can apply for extension of time to invoke the supervisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court

Time within which an applicant can invoke the supervisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court

When the supervisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court should be exercised

Whether a minor or trifling error cane be dealt with in the exercise of the Supreme Court's supervisory jurisdiction

Whether a non-jurisdictional error is a ground for the exercise of the supervisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court

Whether an applicant can reargue before the Supreme Court, under its Supervisory jurisdiction, substantially the same application which was argued before the High Court

Whether an applicant who was not a party to the suit before the lower court can invoke the supervisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court

Whether an error of law which is patent in the decision of the High Court is subject to the supervisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court

Whether defective service can be the basis of invocation of the supervisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court

Whether errors which do not nullify proceedings can be redressed by invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court

Whether every error of law is a ground for the exercise of the Supreme Court's supervisory jurisdiction

Whether failure to follow a binding authority by a lower court warrants the exercise of the Supreme Court's supervisory jurisdiction

Whether failure to render reasons for a particular decision when rendered is a ground for invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court

Whether failure to state the ground on which an application invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is based is fatal

Whether the court can grant an order of reversal in the exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction

Whether the errors of the High Court are subject to the supervisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court

Whether the issue of wrongfully excluded evidence is a matter for the supervisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court

Whether the remedies available to the Supreme Court when exercising its supervisory jurisdiction are limited to the issuing of the conventional writs of certiorari, mandamus, prohibition, etc

Whether the supervisory jurisdiction must be invoked within ninety days of the decision being sought to be quashed

Whether the supervisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is governed by the procedure of the High Court

Whether the supervisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is limited to the issuance of conventional prerogative writs

Whether the Supreme Court can exercise supervisory jurisdiction over the Judicial Service and Attorney-General

Whether the Supreme Court can give an order discontinuing a criminal case in exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction

Access More on judy.legal

Get related cases, follow principles for updates, and access AI-powered research.

Explore judy.legal