Subject Matter Index
Browse cases by legal subject matter and principles
ALL
GHANA
NIGERIA
UNITED KINGDOM
WEST AFRICA
Attitude of the court to abuse of court process
Attitude of the court where it is prayed to invoke any or all of the grounds of frivolousness, vexatiousness or abuse of court process
Circumstances which will give rise to abuse of court process
Conditions that must be satisfied to establish an abuse of court process
Conditions that must exist for an objection on abuse of court process arising from multiplicity of action to succeed
Distinction between action brought under Order 11 rule 18 of CI 47 and under the inherent jurisdiction of the court to set aside a writ for abuse of court process
Duty of the court to prevent an abuse of the court's process where the pleadings disclose no cause of action
Duty placed on a person alleging an abuse of court process
Effect of a process initiated in abuse of the process of court
Effect of a suit initiated in abuse of court process
Elements constituting an abuse of court process
How abuse of court process is disclosed
How abuse of judicial process arises
How to determine whether or not an action constitutes an abuse of court process
How to sustain a charge of abuse of court process
Meaning and nature of an abuse of court process
Nature of appeal that will amount to an abuse of court process
Need to prove an allegation of abuse of court process
Power of the court to punish for abuse of court process
Proper order to be made where an action constitutes an abuse of court process
The principle that it is the action that is later in time that constitutes an abuse of court process
The rule relating to striking out pleadings for abuse of court process
The scope of the concept of abuse of court process
What abuse of court process connotes
What abuse of court process implies and the order the court will make
What abuse of judicial process entails
What constitutes abuse of court process
What constitutes abuse of judicial process
What constitutes an abuse of court process
What the doctrine of abuse of court process entails
What the doctrine of abuse of court process requires
When abuse of judicial process occurs
When an abuse of court process will be said to have occurred
When and how to raise the issue of abuse of court process
When multiplicity of actions will constitute an abuse of court process
Whether abuse of court is merely an irregularity that can be pardoned
Whether abuse of court process is primarily determined by the peculiar facts and circumstances of a case
Whether abuse of court process is synonymous with multiplicity of suits
Whether abuse of court process occurs only where the latter proceeding would be unfair to the other party or work an injustice on him
Whether a litigant is permitted to abuse court processes by resorting to self-help
Whether an action which seeks to circumvent the requisite procedure is an abuse of court process
Whether an action withdrawn and reinstituted constitutes an abuse of court process
Whether an application in a de novo trial constitutes an abuse of court process
Whether an invitation by the plaintiff to the High Court to investigate the judgment delivered by the Judicial Committee of the National House of Chiefs constitutes an abuse of court process
Whether an issue of abuse of court process is an issue of jurisdiction
Whether an order of dismissal is appropriate where the court holds that the proceedings before it amounts to an abuse of court process
Whether a party can be held liable for abuse of court process where he promptly withdrew the second suit
Whether a party's election of one of the options open to him constitutes an abuse of court process
Whether a process permitted by law can constitute abuse of court process
Whether filing a notice of appeal before judgment is delivered amounts to an abuse of court process
Whether instituting multiple suits constitutes an abuse of court process
Whether is the subsequent institution of two concurrent actions that will constitute an abuse of court process
Whether it amounts to an abuse of court process for an applicant to file an application before an appellate court where a similar application is pending before a lower court
Whether it is an abuse of court process for a party to prosecute an appeal that is academic and has been overtaken by events
Whether it is an abuse of court process for a respondent to file both a respondent's notice and a cross-appeal in respect of the same decision appealed against
Whether it is an abuse of court process where a party who sought for time to comply with the orders of the court appeals against the said orders
Whether it is an abuse of process to use the machinery of Notice of Discontinuance without leave to improve a plaintiff's position unjustly
Whether it is an abuse of the process of the Court to seek to relitigate an issue which could have been presented or had been earlier determined between parties
Whether lengthy pleadings constitute abuse of court process
Whether multiplicity of suits is the only way by which abuse of court process can be constituted
Whether or not it is an abuse of court process for a party/parties to re-litigate same or identical issues which has been tried by a competent court
Whether parties to multiple suits must be either plaintiffs/claimants or defendants in all the suits for an abuse of court process to arise
Whether pursuing the same matter before two courts of coordinate jurisdiction amounts to an abuse of court process
Whether raising the same objection on the same subject matter in a suit between the same parties constitute an abuse of court process
Whether relitigating an issue already decided by a court constitutes an abuse of judicial process
Whether seeking the same relief in two different processes amounts to an abuse of court process
Whether setting aside a non-existent application is an abuse of court process
Whether the abuse of court process principle applies where in the new action, the court’s attention is being drawn to either a breach of the constitution or a jurisdictional error
Whether the categories of facts or circumstances that may constitute abuse of Court process are closed
Whether the factual situations that constitute abuse of court process are closed
Whether the filing of an information at the High Court by the Attorney-General while a charge is still pending against the same defendants at the Magistrates Court is an abuse of court process
Whether the filing of two motions which do not necessarily seek the same or similar reliefs amounts to an abuse of court process
Whether the filing of two unrelated appeals constitutes an abuse of court process
Whether the institution of two or more suits by the same parties with the same subject does makes the subsequent suits an abuse of the process of the Court
Whether the issue of abuse of court process is a complete defence to an action
Whether the parties in multiple suits must be exactly the same both in numbers or description for the later or subsequent suit to constitute an abuse of court process
Whether the question of abuse of court process can arise in respect of two motions asking for two different reliefs
Whether the seeking of alternative reliefs by an applicant constitutes an abuse of court process
Whether the settling of a dispute by arbitration amounts to an abuse of court process
Whether two suits must be the same to constitutes abuse of court process
Access More on judy.legal
Get related cases, follow principles for updates, and access AI-powered research.
Explore judy.legal