Talk to us

FRANCIS ANOKYE
V.
DOMINIC ANANE

(2019) JELR 63744 (HC)

High Court 22 Mar 2019 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- Application to strike out defendant’s defence for alleged insufficient and belated answers to interrogatories was dismissed; service on counsel’s office manager was held to be good service by agency and estoppel. - The court held that pro

Case Details

Suit Number:SUIT NO. OCC 05/2019
Judges:HIS LORDSHIP JUSTICE DR. RICHMOND OSEI-HWERE
Counsel:MARGARET MARY ADJEI-TWUM (MRS) FOR PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT,DORCAS OTTI FOR THE DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT

Before me is an application for an order of the court to strike out the statement of defence of the defendant and for judgment to be entered for the plaintiff.

Counsel for the plaintiff/applicant contends that the defendant/respondent has put out a statement of defence which is entirely different from their case. According to counsel, the nature of the defence necessitated the filling of interrogatories in a bid to elicit further and better particulars from the defendant. Counsel submits that the defendant did not only file a belated response to the interrogatories but failed to answer some of the questions. In counsel’s estimation the answers provided were insufficient. Counsel cited Order 22 rule 6 which gives the court the power to strike out the defence of a defendant and enter judgment in favour of a plaintiff if the defendant gives insufficient answers to the interrogatories. Counsel is therefore inviting the court to strike out the defendant’s defence as his belated response amo…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.