Subject Matter Index
Browse cases by legal subject matter and principles
ALL
GHANA
NIGERIA
UNITED KINGDOM
WEST AFRICA
Circumstances where illustration (b) of section 120 of the Criminal Code, 1960 will be applicable
Defences to the offence of stealing
Elements that must be proved by the prosecution to establish the offence of stealing
Nature and punishment for the offence of stealing
Nature of "taking" that amounts to stealing
Position of the law where two or more persons are charged with stealing
The first essential ingredient of stealing
The nature of the offence of stealing as a second degree felony
The particulars of offence in a charge of stealing
The position of the law on stealing by finding
The principle that the prosecution has the burden of proving the specific amount allegedly stolen
What constitutes the offence of stealing
What is necessary to sustain a conviction for stealing
When a case would come under the provision of stealing by conversion
When a thing is said to be stolen
When the date or time an article was stolen will be material to a charge
When the offence of stealing will be said to have been committed
Whether a charge of stealing is proved where a charge of falsification of accounts has been proved
Whether a conviction for stealing would be valid if it is proved that only part of the property was stolen
Whether a corpse can be the subject matter of a stealing charge
Whether a failure to correctly state the owner of the property stolen affect a conviction for stealing
Whether a human skull is a thing capable of being stolen
Whether a person can be guilty of stealing a thing, the ownership of which is in dispute
Whether a person charged with stealing can be convicted of stealing a part of the amount alleged without an amendment of the charge
Whether a person who converts money entrusted to him is liable for stealing
Whether a spouse is capable of stealing from the other under Ghanaian customary law
Whether an accused person can be convicted of stealing a lesser sum
Whether failure to call an identified owner to give evidence of his lack of consent to the appropriation of his property is fatal to a charge of stealing
Whether failure to prove ownership is fatal to a conviction for stealing
Whether it is necessary for the prosecution to prove that all the articles mentioned in the information have been stolen for a charge of stealing to be sustained
Whether it is necessary to prove the ownership or value of the thing in a charge of stealing
Whether land is capable of being stolen
Whether people who own property above their incomes are stealing suspects
Whether roof of fraudulent false accounting means that the suspect is the thief
Whether the fact that a person was not able to pay any money which he should have paid constitutes stealing
Whether the identity of the owner must be proved in a charge of stealing
Whether the inability of the prosecution to prove specific loss to the owner of a thing affects a finding of stealing
Whether the stealing of moneys belonging to a political party is an offence against the State or the public interest or both
Whether there must be an act of the accused of such a nature as to cast a slur on his character revealing him as a person lacking in integrity or as a plainly dishonest person in order to sustain a conviction for stealing
Whether “a claim of right in good faith” is a complete defence to a charge of stealing
Whether, in a charge of stealing, it must be proved that ownership of the thing stolen resides in a particular person
Access More on judy.legal
Get related cases, follow principles for updates, and access AI-powered research.
Explore judy.legal