Subject Matter Index

Browse cases by legal subject matter and principles

Duty of court before coming to the conclusion that the prosecution has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt

Duty of prosecution to prove the offence alleged against the accused person beyond reasonable doubt

Duty on an accused person where the prosecution proves the case against him beyond reasonable doubt

Effect of failure of the prosecution to prove a case beyond reasonable doubt

Effect of failure of the prosecution to prove any one element of the offence beyond reasonable doubt

Effect of failure to prove an essential element of an offence

Effect of the prosecution proving its case against the case beyond reasonable doubt

How the prosecution can prove a case beyond reasonable doubt

Meaning of proof beyond reasonable doubt

Nature of proof beyond reasonable doubt required of the prosecution

Onus on a convicted person who asserts that the prosecution has failed to prove his guilt beyond reasonable doubt

Purport of proof beyond reasonable doubt

Situations where the High Court can properly embark on a determination of whether there was proof beyond reasonable doubt

The duty of the prosecution to prove all the ingredients of the offence charged beyond reasonable doubt

The need for the prosecution to prove the guilt of an accused person in accordance with the ingredients of the offence charged

The rule that it is better that nine guilty persons escape than for an innocent man to be condemned

The rule that offences must be proved beyond reasonable doubt

The rule that the conviction of an accused person must be based on evidence proved beyond reasonable doubt

What an accused person alleging that the prosecution has failed to prove his guilt beyond reasonable doubt must establish

When an offence will be said to be proved beyond reasonable doubt

When the guilt of an accused person will be said not to have been established beyond reasonable doubt

When the prosecution will be said to have proved its case beyond reasonable doubt

Whether a criminal trial will be said to have been proved beyond reasonable doubt where there are unexplained material contradictions in the evidence of prosecution witnesses

Whether lies by an accused person can ground a conviction in the absence of proof beyond reasonable doubt

Whether proof beyond reasonable doubt implies proof beyond every shadow of doubt

Whether the accused person may not utter a word in his defence in a criminal trial against him

Whether the proof of all the vital ingredients of the offence amounts to proof beyond reasonable doubt

Whether the prosecution can draw on the inadequacy and incompetence of the evidence of the accused person

Whether there would be proof beyond reasonable doubt where the prosecution presents to the Court two versions of the same incident; one inculpatory and the other exculpatory

Access More on judy.legal

Get related cases, follow principles for updates, and access AI-powered research.

Explore judy.legal