Customer Support

ABDULAI III & ORS
V.
THE REPUBLIC

(1989) JELR 83988 (CA)

Court of Appeal 26 Jan 1989 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- Appellants were convicted by the Circuit Court, Tamale, and their convictions were affirmed on appeal by the High Court, Tamale; they sought to appeal further to the Court of Appeal. - The Republic challenged the appeal, arguing that, per

Case Details

Judges:AMPIAH JA, LAMPTEY JA AND ESSIEM JA.
Counsel:Amui (with him Kuenyehia) For the Appellants. Sam Baddoo, Chief State Attorney, For the Republic.
Location:Accra
Other Citations:[1989-90] 1 GLR 348

AMPIAH J.A.

On 22 June 1987 the appellants were convicted on various charges by the Circuit Court, Tamale and sentenced accordingly. The appellants appealed to the High Court, Tamale which also affirmed the convictions and dismissed the appeal. Aggrieved by this judgment, the appellants have once again appealed to this court. Before the merits of the appeal could be argued, counsel for the Republic submitted that the appeal was not properly before the court. He referred the court to section 2 (3) (b) of the Courts (Amendment) Law, 1987 (P.N.D.C.L. 191), and said in view of the fact that the appellants had not asked for leave from the court below, they could not be heard by this court on their appeal. Section 2 (3) (b) of P.N.D.C.L. 191 provides:

"(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this subsection, where a decision of the High Court confirms the decision appealed against from a lower court, an appeal from the High Court may lie to the Court of Appeal with leave of the…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.