Customer Support

ABIOYE & ORS
V.
STATE

(1986) JELR 39697 (CA)

Court of Appeal 10 Dec 1986 Nigeria
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The case involves three appellants who were charged with conspiracy, forgery, and theft. - The appellants were accused of conspiring to remove signature cards from a bank's computer room, facilitating the forgery of signatures on cheques

Case Details

Suit Number:CA/K/57/85
Judges:ABUBAKAR BASHIR WALI Justice of The Court of Appeal of Nigeria EPHRAIM OMOROSE IBUKUN AKPATA Justice of The Court of Appeal of Nigeria JOSEPH DIEKOLA OGUNDERE Justice of The Court of Appeal of Nigeria
Counsel:P. A. Olurunnisola - For 1st AppellantDavid Babalola - For 3rd Appellant For Appellant R. A. Afolabi DDPP (Kwara State) For Respondent
Other Citations:Abioye v. The State (1987) 2 NWLR (Pt.58)

EPHRAIM OMOROSE IBUKUN AKPATA, J.C.A. (Delivering the Leading Judgment): What is conspiracy? Does it require direct evidence to establish it? Can an accused person acquitted of committing the substantive offence be convicted of conspiracy? Can it be inferred from the failure of a bank official to detect a number of forged cheques that he conspired with others to commit forgery and theft" These are the questions which have surfaced in this appeal.

Between November 1979 and February 1980 Olusola Adedeji, the 3rd appellant, was the Accountant of the Societe Generale Bank Nigeria Ltd. Ilorin. The 2nd appellant, Lawrence Adeniranye, who did not prosecute his appeal was a clerk in the Bank having custody of the Bank's cheque between November 1979 and May 1980. The 1st appellant, Timothy Abioye, was the Computer Room Supervisor of the Bank and his duty was to verify all signatures on cheques presented by customers he being in charge of specimen signature cards.

Sometime in April or May 1980 …

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.