Customer Support

ABN AMRO BANK N.V
V.
KENYA PIPELINE COMPANY LIMITED

(2019) JELR 106456 (CA)

Court of Appeal 19 Jul 2019 Kenya
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- ABN Amro Bank Limited (appellant), as universal successor to Fortis Bank, sued Kenya Pipeline Company Limited (respondent) in HCCC No. 3 of 2012, seeking damages for loss of petroleum products held in trust by the respondent and allegedly

Case Details

Suit Number:Civil Appeal 149 of 2015
Judges:Erastus Mwaniki Githinji JA Hannah Magondi Okwengu JA Jamila Mohammed JA
Location:Nairobi
Other Citations:ABN Amro Bank N.V v. Kenya Pipeline Company Limited[2019] eKLR

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

Background

[1] ABN Amro Bank Limited (the appellant herein) is the plaintiff in High Court Civil Case No 3 of 2012 (the suit). It has sued the Kenya Pipeline Company Limited (the respondent herein). In that suit, the appellant alleges that through Fortis Bank (Nederland) NV (Fortis), a licensed banking institution headquartered in the Netherlands, was involved in various transactions between it and various petroleum companies in Kenya. Pursuant to a merger between Fortis and the appellant on 1st July 2010, all the assets, rights and liabilities of Fortis were acquired by ABN Amro Bank by virtue of universal succession of title in accordance with Dutch law, including all claims that Fortis had with respect to transactions entered into.

[2] Vide its amended plaint filed on 8th May, 2012, the appellant alleged that between 27th October 2007 and 9th March 2008, it entered into an agreement with Triton Petroleum Company Limited (TPC), Triton Energy (K) Ltd [Triton Energy…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.