Customer Support

ADESOLA
V.
ABIDOYE & ANOR.

(1999) JELR 43780 (SC)

Supreme Court 3 Dec 1999 Nigeria
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- Dispute arose over the appointment of Mogaji (head of the Oluokun family, Ibadan) after the death of the incumbent; both appellant (Adesola) and 1st respondent (Olatunji) were separately nominated by different branches of the family, with

Case Details

Suit Number:SC.265/1993
Judges:ADOLPHUS GODWIN KARIBI-WHYTE Justice of The Supreme Court of Nigeria MICHAEL EKUNDAYO OGUNDARE Justice of The Supreme Court of Nigeria SYLVESTER UMARU ONU Justice of The Supreme Court of Nigeria ANTHONY IKECHUKWU IGUH Justice of The Supreme Court of Nigeria EMMANUEL OLAYINKA AYOOLA Justice of The Supreme Court of Nigeria
Counsel:Olakunle Sonibare, Esq., For Appellant A. Abimhola, Esq For Respondent
Other Citations:Adesola v. Abidoye (1999) 14 NWLR (Pt. 637) 28

A. G. KARIBI-WHYTE, J.S.C (Delivering the Leading Judgment): This appeal is essentially about the interpretation of the provisions of section 22(5) of the Chieftaincy Law Cap. 21 Vol. 1 of the Laws of Oyo State, 1978. The need for the interpretation was provoked by the criticisms of the procedure allegedly adopted in the filling of the vacant position of the Mogaji of the Oluokun family of Ibadan.

THE FACTS.

On the 21st August, 1986, Gbadamosi Adeleke, the Asiwaju Balogun and the last Mogaji of Oluokun family Ibadan died. A vacancy accordingly for a successor was created. Plaintiff, Mr. Oladiti Adesola from the Aderin branch of the Oluokun family was interested and was nominated to the Olubadan of Ibadan, the 2nd Defendant in this action by his branch of the Oluokun family to fill the vacant position. He claimed it was the turn of his branch of the Family to fill the vacant position. Alhaji Raimi Abidoye Olatunji of the Adetunji branch of the Oluokun Family also interested was nomina…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.