ADOFO AND OTHERS
V.
ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND ANOTHER

(2005) JELR 68331 (SC)

Supreme Court 20 Apr 2005 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The plaintiffs, former employees of the Ghana Cocoa Board (Cocobod), sought enforcement of the Constitution, 1992, arguing that the Ghana Cocoa Board (Re-organisation and Indemnity) Law, 1985 (PNDCL 125) ceased to exist or have any effect

Case Details

Judges:ATUGUBA JSC, AKUFFO JSC, WOOD JSC, DATE-BAH JSC, ANINAKWAH JSC
Counsel:SAMUEL KLAYSON FOR THE PLAINTIFFS,MRS KATHLEEN QUARTEY AYEN CHIEF STATE ATTORNEY FOR THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL THE FIRST DEFENDANT,JOHN D CLOTTEY-SEFA FOR THE GHANA BOARD THE SECOND DEFENDANT


DATE-BAH JSC.

This is the unanimous judgment of the court. The plaintiffs issued a writ on 2 March 2004 seeking an enforcement of the Constitution, 1992 by:

“(1) A declaration that by the proper interpretation of article 36(1) and (2) of the Constitution, 1992, PNDCL 125 ceased to exist or to have any effect upon the coming into effect of the Constitution, 1992 of the Republic of Ghana.
(2) A declaration that the said PNDCL 125 is inconsistent with the provision of the Constitution, 1992 in so far as it tends to discriminate against certain categories of workers in Ghana and within the Cocobod.
(3) A declaration that the said PNDCL 125 is unconscionable and must be removed from the statute books of Ghana.”

The writ was expressed to be issued by three plaintiffs, namely Ernest Adofo, Paul K Sekley and Samuel Ntiful “for themselves and on behalf of 70 other workers of the Cocobod retrenched in September 1994.” In the accompanying statement of case, verified by an affidavit deposed to by th…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.