ADRIAN KAMOTHO NJENGA
V.
JUDICIAL SERVICE COMMISSION & 9 ORS

(2022) JELR 113319 (CA)

Court of Appeal 2 Dec 2022 Kenya
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The case concerned the interpretation of Article 27(6) and (8) of the Constitution of Kenya regarding the two-thirds gender principle, specifically its application to the composition of the Supreme Court. - Following the 2016 appointment

Case Details

Suit Number:Civil Appeal 234 of 2017
Judges:AK MURGOR, JA J MOHAMMED, JA
Location:Nairobi

JUDGMENT

  1. This appeal brings to the fore, the question of the interpretation of article 27 of the Constitution, and in particular the edict contained in article 27(8) which requires the State to take measures to “implement the principle that not more than two-thirds of the members of elective or appointive bodies shall be of the same gender.” This principle is colloquially known as, “the two-thirds gender principle”.

  2. In June, 2016, three (3) vacancies arose in the Supreme Court of Kenya - for the positions of Chief Justice, Deputy Chief Justice and Judge of the Supreme Court. The Judicial Service Commission, the 1st respondent herein, advertised and shortlisted candidates for these positions. After the recruitment process, the 1st respondent nominated for appointment His Lordship, the now Retired Chief Justice David Maraga, Her Ladyship, the Deputy Chief Justice Philomena Mwilu and His Lordship, the Hon Mr Justice Isaac Lenaola all of whom are named in this appeal as 5th, 6th and 4th res…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.