Customer Support

AFFRAM AND OTHERS
V.
DIDIYE III; TWUM II
V.
DIDIYE III (CONSOLIDATED)

(1999) JELR 69477 (CA)

Court of Appeal 14 Feb 1999 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The case involves two consolidated appeals where the issues, both factual and legal, were almost the same. - The plaintiff and his people have been licensees to the stool of Burukuruwa for about 150 years, but they claimed to have discove

Case Details

Judges:WOOD JA,BROBBEY JA,BENIN JA
Counsel:WAN ADUMUA-BOSSMAN FOR THE APPELLANT; OFORI YEBOAH FOR THE RESPONDENT.
Other Citations:[1999-2000] 2 GLR 148

BENIN JA

I must start off by saying that these two cases were consolidated here on appeal just to facilitate the hearing since it became clear that the issues, both factual and legal, were almost the same in both appeals. Hence only one statement of case was filed by either counsel in both appeals, so that whatever analysis that may be done will apply to both appeals; but we will not hesitate to make separate orders should that become necessary.

The facts giving rise to these actions were not in much disputes. For about a hundred and fifty years the plaintiff-respondent (hereinafter called the plaintiff) and his people, both past and present, have been licencees to the stool of Burukuruwa (hereinafter referred to as the stool) in the Kwahu area of the Afram plains, in respect of a large stretch of land. Sometime in the year 1990, the plaintiff and his people claimed to have discovered a document which showed in clear language that the very land, and even more, in respect of which they w…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.