Customer Support

AG CROSS RIVER STATE & ANOR.
V.
OJUA

(2010) JELR 47629 (CA)

Court of Appeal 18 Mar 2010 Nigeria
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The respondent, a legal practitioner and property owner in Ikom, Cross River State of Nigeria, challenged the Urban Development Tax Law, 2004 upon receiving assessment notices for various taxes and levies. - The respondent sought a declar

Case Details

Suit Number:CA/C/03/2009
Judges:KUMAI BAYANG AKAAHS Justice of The Court of Appeal of Nigeria NWALI S. NGWUTA Justice of The Court of Appeal of Nigeria JEAN OMOKRI Justice of The Court of Appeal of Nigeria
Counsel:Chief Assam E. Assam, SAN, with him I. Ikona, DCL, CRS, William Anwan, Chief E. Usenekong, Rekana Isong, Nneka Agu and Adora Okoli (Miss) For Appellant Respondent appears in person. For Respondent

KUMAI BAYANG AKAAHS, JCA (DELIVERING THE LEADING JUDGMENT): The respondent, a legal practitioner and property owner in Ikom, Cross River State of Nigeria was served with assessment notices for the payment of Urban Development Tax, Tenement Rate, Sanitation Levy and Refuse Collection charges in respect of his properties located in Ikom in 2005. He challenged by an originating summons the Urban Development Tax Law, 2004 upon which the assessment was predicated since he is paying similar taxes to the Local Government and sought for the following reliefs:-

1. A declaration that by virtue of the Taxes And Levies (Approved List For Collection) Act Cap T2 Laws of the Federation 2004, and the doctrine of covering the field, the Cross River State Urban Development Tax Law 2004 is unconstitutional, illegal, null and void and of no consequence whatsoever.

2. An order setting aside assessment notices for the payment of Urban Development Tax, Tenement rate, Refuse Collection Charge and Sanitation Le…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.