Customer Support

ALHASSAN
V.
BOADU

(1977) JELR 64529 (HC)

High Court 23 May 1977 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The court held that a writ unserved after twelve months is not a nullity, and the court retains discretion under Order 64, r. 6 of the High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 1954 to extend time for renewal, even post-limit, unless expressly

Case Details

Judges:EDWARD WIREDU J.
Counsel:IBRAHIM MAHAMA FOR THE APPLICANT.
Other Citations:[1977] 2 GLR 248

EDWARD WIREDU J.

This is an application ex parte by the plaintiff herein brought under Order 64, r. 6 and Order 8, r. 1 of the High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 1954 (L.N. 140A), for an extension of time within which to apply for a renewal of a writ issued against the defendant for damages for personal injuries under the Civil Liability Act, 1963 (Act 176). The present application has been provoked by the fact that the writ has remained unserved after expiration of twelve months. The accident in respect of which the action was commenced occurred on or about 30 October 1973 and the application itself is supported by an affidavit setting out unsuccessful attempts made to effect personal service on the defendant.

The issues raised for consideration are: (a) what is the effect of a writ which had not been served within twelve months? Whether it is a dead writ and therefore incapable of being renewed; (b) if not dead whether the court has power to grant an extension of time under Order 64…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.