Customer Support

ASARE AND OTHERS
V.
THE REPUBLIC (NO. 2)

(1968) JELR 86252 (CA)

Court of Appeal 15 Jan 1968 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The case involves an objection raised by the second appellant's counsel regarding the participation of Apaloo J.A. in the bench for the appeal. - The objection is based on two passages from the Apaloo Commission report, which mention the

Case Details

Judges:OLLENNU, AZU CRABBE, APALOO AND LASSEY JJ.A. AND EDUSEI J.
Counsel:Narayan (with him H. Darkoh) for the first appellant. P. A. Adjetey for the second appellant. B. J. da Rocha for the third appellant. J.N. K. Taylor, Director of Public Prosecutions (with him Kisseih, Senior State Attorney) for the respondent.
Other Citations:[1968] GLR 50 - 53

OLLENU J.A. delivered the ruling of the court.

Learned counsel for the second appellant, Henry Kwadwoe Djaba, objected to Apaloo J.A. joining to constitute the bench for the hearing of the appeal. He grounded his objection upon two short passages which appear in paragraph 144 at p. 24 of the report of the commission of inquiry appointed to inquire into the Kwame Nkrumah Properties, popularly known as the Apaloo Commission after its chairman, Apaloo J.A. The passages referred to read: (i) "Djaba was himself, as is well known, recently convicted of a gigantic fraud" and (ii) "It is not difficult to discern from the attitude which he put up that he expected the ex-President to intervene to stop the prosecution which resulted in his conviction."

Counsel said he took the objection with great trepidation but in the interest of justice, for, he submitted, the words "recently convicted of a gigantic fraud" is likely to convey to the ordinary man, the impression that the learned judge has alrea…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.