ASIN APIMANIM LOCAL COUNCIL
V.
WILLIAMSON

(1965) JELR 64758 (HC)

High Court 29 Jan 1965 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The appeal in this case raises two legal questions: the jurisdiction of the Asin Local Court and the recoverability of money paid under a mistake of law or fact. - The plaintiff's claim was for the recovery of £G28, which was an overpayme

Case Details

Judges:LASSEY J.
Counsel:F. SARKODEE STATE ATTORNEY FOR THE APPELLANTS; KOFI SACKEY FOR THE RESPONDENT.
Other Citations:[1965] GLR 18

LASSEY J.: This appeal poses two important legal questions. The first point of law concerns the jurisdiction of the Asin Local Court before which the plaintiff’s action was commenced and tried, and the second point concerns whether or not money paid under a mistake of law or of fact or of mixed fact and law is recoverable. I propose to deal first with the question regarding the jurisdiction of the local court.

The plaintiffs’ claim before the Asin Local Court was for the recovery of the sum of £G28, being the difference in an overpayment in salary wrongly paid to the defendant. The defendant was at the material time when money was paid to him employed by the Apimanim Local Council. He was the council’s nurse and was paid his salaries from the council’s votes. He was on an annual salary of £G301.

Learned counsel for the respondent, Mr. Sackey, submitted that as the plaintiffs, namely, the Asin Apimanim Local Council, were at the material time of the trial before the local court a governm…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.