JUDGMENT
Plaintiff’s claim per the endorsement on his writ of summons is as follows:
a. A declaration that the interdiction of the Plaintiff by the Defendant from 1994 to date is unlawful.
b. An order directed at the Defendant to re-instate the Plaintiff
c. An order for payment of all his salary and allowances from the date of interdiction to date, due Plaintiff.
d. Interest on all monies found due from Defendant to Plaintiff. e. Damages
f. Any other order(s) as this Court may deem just and equitable.
In its statement of defence, Defendant pleaded that Plaintiff’s action is statute barred hence the issue whether or not the instant suit is statute barred. At the application for directions, the court ordered parties to file written legal arguments for this issue to be determined in the preliminary. Plaintiff failed to file his legal argument but Defendant did.
Per paragraphs 33 and 38 of his statement of claim, Plaintiff averred that, he was interdicted on 9th November, 1994 an…