Customer Support

AUBREY TSATUS TAMAKLOE AND ANOTHER
V.
COMMERCIAL INVESTMENT LIMITED

(2017) JELR 66610 (HC)

High Court 12 Jun 2017 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The plaintiff has applied for summary judgment against the defendant, claiming that the defendant has no defense to the action. - The 1st plaintiff claims that the defendant owes them USD$13,365.28, while the 2nd plaintiff claims an amoun

Case Details

Suit Number:SUIT NO. GJ 366/2017
Judges:ERIC K. BAFFOUR ESQ. JUSTICE OF THE HIGH COURT
Counsel:PLAINTIFF APPEARS IN PERSON,R. O. SOLOMON ESQ FOR DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT APPEARING WITH …

It is stated under Order 14 Rule 1 of the High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules that:

“Where in an action a defendant has been served with a statement of claim and has filed appearance, the plaintiff may on notice apply to the Court for judgment against the defendant on the ground that the defendant has no defence to a claim included in the writ, or to a particular part of such a claim, or that the defendant has no defence to such a claim or part of a claim, except as to the amount of any damages claimed”.

Plaintiff/Applicants have mounted this application for summary judgment contending that the Defendant/Respondent has no defence to the action. 1st plaintiff claim, on the endorsement on the writ claim that defendant is indebted to it to the tune of USD$13,365.28 whiles 2nd plaintiff claims an amount of USD$10,432.32 together with interest.

The factual basis of this application can briefly be stated as follows: 1st Plaintiff responded to the promotion of defendant by applying to purchase a…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.