Customer Support

AUDIO VISUAL RIGHTS SOCIETY
V.
FIESTA ROYALE HOTEL

(2023) JELR 112420 (CA)

Court of Appeal 11 May 2023 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The case involves a claimant who had capacity to sue at the commencement of the action but lost capacity during the proceedings. - The defendant challenged the claimant's capacity, arguing that it lost its capacity to pursue the action af

Case Details

Suit Number:H1/88/2023
Judges:Poku-Acheampong, JA (Presiding) Adjei-Frimpong, J.A. Dr. E.Owusu-Dapaah, J.A.
Counsel:Regina Martin Peprah for Appellant. Victor Lassey for Respondent.
Location:Accra

 J U D G M E N T

Adjei-Frimpong, J.A:

This suit raises an issue of some procedural law importance. In the main, it turns on a claimant having capacity to sue but losing such capacity after the action has been commenced. What should be the effect of such loss of capacity on the claim being pursued? 

It is axiomatic that capacity to sue or locus standi is always a crucial matter in any civil suit when challenged. For a suit to be competent for adjudication by a court, there must be at least a competent Plaintiff and a competent Defendant in the sense that both were juristic persons with locus standi to sue and be sued. Where the existing Plaintiff or Defendant lacks competence, it renders the action incompetent regardless of the merits and the court is robbed of its requisite jurisdiction to determine the underlying claim.

That the Plaintiff/Respondent (herein ‘Plaintiff’) was clothed with capacity at the commencement of the instant action at the trial court became common ground. The Defend…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.