Customer Support

AZORBLIE AND OTHERS
V.
ANKRAH IV

(1985) JELR 69289 (CA)

Court of Appeal 20 Nov 1985 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The defendants filed a motion in the Court of Appeal asking for an order of prohibition against the High Court from hearing a chieftaincy matter. - The defendants argue that the High Court has no jurisdiction to hear the matter, but the H

Case Details

Judges:ADADE J.S.C,AMUAH-SEKYI J,AMPIAH J.
Counsel:SAMMY TAY FOR THE APPLICANTS; ARMSTRONG ACKUAKU FOR THE RESPONDENT.

ADADE J.S.C.: Adade J.S.C delivered the ruling of the court. On 5 November 1985 the defendants, by counsel, filed a “motion on notice” in this court asking: “for an order of prohibition against the High Court, Ho presided over by Apatu-Plange J. from hearing the above suit, and for such other orders as this honourable court may deem fit.”

The main ground for the application is that the suit before the High Court, Ho is a chieftaincy matter which the court has no jurisdiction to entertain. Unfortunately, the applicants contend, the High Court insists on hearing the matter, notwithstanding objections by them.

Mr Armstrong Ackuaku, for the plaintiff-respondent, objects to the Court of Appeal hearing the defendants’ motion on the ground that this court has no jurisdiction. He says in his notice of preliminary objection that: “a motion for prohibition is not maintainable at the Court of Appeal at first instance.” He argues that the Court of Appeal has no supervisory jurisdiction over the Hig…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.