Customer Support

BASSIL
V.
RAAD

(1961) JELR 67575 (HC)

High Court 16 Mar 1961 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The plaintiff is claiming against the defendant as the drawer of a cheque. - The defendant argues that the cheque is unenforceable because it was issued in a moneylending transaction that violates the Moneylenders Ordinance. - The plainti

Case Details

Judges:OLLENNU J
Counsel:J. C. ARMAH FOR PLAINTIFF ,E. N. MOORE FOR DEFENDANT

OLLENNU J.

This is a claim made against the defendant as the drawer of a cheque. The defence is that the said cheque was issued to the plaintiff in a moneylending transaction which contravenes the Moneylenders Ordinance, Cap. 176, (1951 Rev.) and therefore it is unenforceable. In his reply to the statement of defence, the plaintiff contended that the transaction in connection with which the cheque was issued, although a loan transaction is not a money lending transaction within the Moneylenders Ordinance  Cap. 176, (1951 Rev.), because he gave the loan without interest, and therefore the claim is one purely on a cheque. According to the plaintiff he has never presented the said cheque for payment because the defendant told him not to.

A claim upon a cheque is governed by the Bills of Exchange Ordinance Cap. 195 (1951 Rev.). In order to charge the drawee and the endorser of a bill, section 45 of the Ordinance makes it mandatory that it must first of all be presented for payment in accor…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.