Customer Support

BISI AND OTHERS
V.
TABIRI ALIAS ASARE

(1987) JELR 68011 (SC)

Supreme Court 28 Jul 1987 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The plaintiff claimed that house No SW 52 and its extensions, referred to as SW 66, were family property and that the alleged will of the deceased owner, which cut off his other children, was null and void. - The trial judge ruled in favo

Case Details

Judges:TAYLOR JSC,FRANCOIS JS.C. ,OSEI-HWERE JA,WUAKU JA,AMUA-SEKYI J.A
Counsel:ENOCH D KOM FOR THE DEFENDANT-APPELLANTS; A. A. OWUSU (WITH HIM W N OPPONG) FOR THE RESPONDENT.
Other Citations:[1987-88] 1 GLR 360

OSEI-HWERE J.A.: Osei-Hwere J.A. delivered the first judgment at the invitation of Taylor J.S.C. By a majority verdict of this court we dismissed the defendants’ appeal on 25 June 1987 but reserved our reasons which I proceed to give now. The appeal that came before us sought, in effect, to challenge the concurrent findings of the High Court and the Court of Appeal that house No SW 52 with its extensions is family property. In order to settle any confusion about nomenclature it has to be noted that the house with its extensions straddles two plots which, from the records of the Lands Department, bears the composite name of plot No SW 66, Area No 3, Sunyani. At the trial the main building, comprising two completed floors, was referred to as SW 52 whilst the uncompleted extensions were referred to as SW 66.

The late Asare Adjabeng was the uterine junior brother of the plaintiff. After his death his alleged will in which he devised house No 52 including plot No SW 66 to his five children …

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.