JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
The appellant was aggrieved by the ruling of the High Court (Majanja, J) which found the Notice of Motion application for review dated 24th November, 2016, as incompetent and dismissed the same. The said application was provoked by an order made by the Deputy Registrar on 22nd November, 2011, which authorized the attachment of one-third of the appellant’s salary on Judgment debtor to settle the Kshs. 209,527/= being costs against it.
The said application sought two orders, namely; for a stay of execution of the order issued by the court dated 22nd November, 2016, and for the court to review and or vary/set aside orders issued on the 22nd November, 2016. The application was predicated on five grounds, outlined on the face of the application. In the supporting affidavit deposed to by Michael Juma Otieno, it was sworn that the respondent’s advocates Otieno, Yogo, Ojuro and Company Advocates were not properly on record since they came on record for the respondent over …