Customer Support

CHARLES MWIRIGI MIRITI
V.
THANANGA TEA GROWERS SACCO LTD & ANOTHER

(2014) JELR 103265 (CA)

Court of Appeal 18 Jun 2014 Kenya
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The appellant, registered owner of Plot No. 21 in Maua Municipality, sued for specific performance or, alternatively, damages after the 1st respondent repudiated a written agreement dated 3 July 2000 to purchase the property, with payment

Case Details

Suit Number:Civil Appeal 158 of 2001
Judges:Alnashir Ramazanali Magan Visram, Martha Karambu Koome, James Otieno Odek
Location:Nyeri
Other Citations:Charles Mwirigi Miriti v. Thananga Tea Growers Sacco Ltd & another [2014] eKLR

JUDGEMENT OF THE COURT

[1] This is a first appeal against the decision of the High Court (Tuiyot, J.) dated 23rd April, 2001. This Court is required to analyze and re-assess the evidence on record and reach its own conclusion in the matter. It was put more appropriately in Selle -vs- Associated Motor Boat Co. [1968] EA 123, thus:

“An appeal to this Court from a trial by the High Court is by way of retrial and the principles upon which this Court acts in such an appeal are well settled. Briefly put they are that this Court must reconsider the evidence, evaluate it itself and draw its own conclusions though it should always bear in mind that it has neither seen nor heard the witnesses and should make due allowance in this respect. In particular this Court is not bound necessarily to follow the trial judge’s findings of fact if it appears either that he has clearly failed on some point to take account of particular circumstances or probabilities materially to estimate the evidence or if th…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.