RULING OF THE COURT
[1] UPON perusing the Notice of Motion in the application by the Applicant dated and filed on 2nd June, 2017 brought under Sections 8, 17 and 20 of the Supreme Court Act 2011 and Rule 26 of the Supreme Court 2012, seeking that this application be certified urgent and that the Court does allow the Applicant to file additional grounds of appeal herein as well as a Supplementary record of appeal; and
[2] UPON reading the Applicant’s grounds in support of the application and the Supporting affidavit sworn on 1st February, 2019 which state that “the crux of the appeal and all the grounds serialized by the former applicant’s Advocates crystallize into the grounds proposed to be added” which addition is principal to understanding the dispute and the substance of which, in sum, is that the High Court erred by ignoring the pleadings filed by the Applicant and proceeded to grant remedies to the 1st Respondent (which were not sought against the Applicant) and the order returnin…