Customer Support

COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE
V.
ATTORNEY-GENERAL

(1999) JELR 68228 (SC)

Supreme Court 23 Jun 1999 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The Supreme Court held that the Commission for Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ) has no jurisdiction or supervisory power to review decisions or restore properties confiscated by courts or tribunals established under the AFR

Case Details

Judges:CHARLES HAYFRON-BENJAMIN JSC,AMPIAH JSC,ADJABENG JSC,ATUGUBA JSC,AKUFFO JSC
Counsel:E K OFOSU-QUARTEY FOR THE PLAINTIFF; MARTIN A B K AMIDU, DEPUTY ATTORNEY-GENERAL (WITH HIM MRS BETTY MOULD-IDDRISU, CHIEF STATE ATTORNEY) FOR THE DEFENDANT.
Other Citations:[1999-2000] 1 GLR 697

HAYFRON-BENJAMIN, J.

On 31 July 1998 this court dismissed the writ of the commission invoking the assistance of this court to resolve an apparent conflict in the relative positions of the parties vis-à-vis their respective functions under the Constitution, 1992. For whereas the plaintiff (Commissioner for Human Rights and Administrative Justice) is “In the performance of (their) functions, not subject to the direction or control of any person or authority”, the defendant (the Attorney-General) on the other hand is a member of the executive branch of government and the chief legal adviser to the government.

The principles of the separation of powers to which to a great extent our Constitution, 1992 gives support enjoin this court as arbiters of conflicts within the Constitution, 1992 in the interpretation or enforcement thereof, not to adopt attitudes and positions which may appear to incline us into proffering advice on matters which do not come within the ambit of our adversarial adju…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.