Customer Support

DANIEL AYAREBA
V.
ATTORNEY GENERAL

(2017) JELR 65402 (CA)

Court of Appeal 23 Mar 2017 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The case revolves around the interpretation of article 14(7) of the 1992 Constitution. - The applicant argues that a person who has served their sentence and is acquitted on appeal is entitled to compensation. - The respondent disagrees a

Case Details

Suit Number:CRIMINAL APPEAL/MOTION NO: H3/6/2017
Judges:KUSI-APPIAH J.A.
Counsel:MR. ANTHONY NAMOO FOR THE APPELLANT/APPLICANT,MRS. MARINA APPIAH OPARE, CHIEF OF STATE ATTORNEY FOR THE RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

RULING

KUSI-APPIAH, J.A.:

This application turns on the correct interpretation to place on article 14(7) of the 1992 Constitution. There are other ancillary matters too. The article provides that:

“14(7)Where a person who has served the whole or a part of his sentence is acquitted on appeal by a court, other than the Supreme Court, the court may certify to Supreme Court that the person acquitted be paid compensation, and the Supreme Court may, upon examination of all the facts and the certificate of the court concerned, award such compensation as it may think fit, or where the acquittal is by the Supreme Court, it may order compensation to be paid to the person acquitted.”

The appellant/applicant (hereinafter referred to as the applicant) contends that by this provision a person who has served the whole or a part of his sentence is acquitted on appeal by a court, is entitled to be paid compensation upon that court certifying same to the Supreme Court. The respondent/respondent (hereinafte…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.