Customer Support

DAVID APASERA & 42 ORS.
V.
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL & ANOR.

(2020) JELR 92049 (SC)

Supreme Court 3 Dec 2020 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The case involves a question of whether it was constitutional for the Chinery Hesse Committee (CHC) to recommend pension payments to the plaintiffs. - The CHC was a committee set up by the President to determine salaries, allowances, and

Case Details

Suit Number:REFERENCE NO. J6/03/2020
Judges:DOTSE, JSC (PRESIDING), GBADEGBE, JSC, PWAMANG, JSC, DORDZIE (MRS), JSC, AMEGATCHER, JSC, LOVELACE-JOHNSON (MS), JSC, PROF. MENSA-BONSU (MRS), JSC
Counsel:MARIAN SERWAA MENSAH FOR THE PLAINTIFFS/APPELLANTS. AKAWARI-LINURU ATINDEM, STATE ATTORNEY FOR THE DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS.

JUDGMENT

GBADEGBE, JSC

The question presented for our decision in this case as set out in the order of reference from the Court of Appeal dated 10th day of June 2020 is in short as follows:

“Whether on the combined reading of the constitutional provisions, we have alluded to and referred to by the parties, i.e. Articles 71(3), 98(1), 114 and 295, it was constitutional for the CHC to have recommended payment of pension to the plaintiffs?

Although the order of reference did not fully indicate what is meant by CHC, a fair reading of the ruling of the Court of Appeal under which the order of reference was made under Article 130(2) of the 1992 Constitution informs us that it is an acronym for the Chinery Hesse Committee. That was a committee set up by the President in the exercise of his powers to determine the “salaries and allowances payable and the facilities, and privileges available,” to designated public officials under Article 71 of the Constitution. The facts on which the reference tu…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.