JUDGMENT
ASIAMAH J.
The plaintiffs who were formerly employees of the defendant company and were sacked for allegedly constituting themselves into “an unlawful conspiracy masterminded by the plaintiffs to harass and intimidate management and to incite the other workers of the company to embark on an illegal strike” have brought this action, claiming the sum of ¢387,200 “being the total amount representing the respective monthly half salaries of the plaintiffs from December 1995 to March 1996 during which period they were unlawfully interdicted by the defendant company” and “general damages for the unlawful dismissal ... by the management of the defendant company in April 1996” and “an order compelling the defendant company to give the plaintiffs their other terminal benefits in line with the company’s operating collective agreement.”
The event leading to the dismissal of the plaintiffs was traced to a letter purported to have been written by the entire workers of the defendant company …