JUDGMENT
Parties herein are workers of the banking sector. Plaintiffs are a couple with the 2nd plaintiff being a wife of the 1st plaintiff who also works with the defendant at First capital plus bank. It is the case of the plaintiffs that they contracted with the defendant for the purchase of a vehicle, but when the vehicle was delivered, contrary to the normal function of every vehicle, it was stationary and failed to perform its function of moving from one place to the other, they therefore sued on 24th June 2014, claiming the following reliefs:
i. A declaration that the defendant had been fraudulent in his dealings with the plaintiff
ii. A declaration that the defendant has breached the agreement he entered into with the plaintiff to import for them a used 4x4 car which can be driven and accident free
iii. General damages against the defendant for breach of contract iv. An order directed at the defendant to refund to the plaintiff the cedi equivalent of $16,470
v. Inter…