Customer Support

ELUFIOYE & ORS
V.
HALILU & ORS

(1990) JELR 40444 (CA)

Court of Appeal 15 Jan 1990 Nigeria
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The case involved interlocutory appeals arising from the refusal of the trial court to dismiss, for lack of locus standi, a suit by individual union members against union officials for alleged constitutional breaches within the National U

Case Details

Suit Number:CA/L/38/89
Judges:ADENEKAN ADEMOLA Justice of The Court of Appeal of Nigeria EPHRAIM OMOROSE IBUKUN AKPATA Justice of The Court of Appeal of Nigeria BOLARINWA OYEGOKE BABALAKIN Justice of The Court of Appeal of Nigeria FRANCIS OLISA AWOGU Justice of The Court of Appeal of Nigeria UMARU ATU KALGO Justice of The Court of Appeal of Nigeria
Counsel:Chief F.R.A. Williams, S.A.N. (with him, Mrs. O.A. Oyagbola and F. R. A. Williams Junior) -for the 1st, 3rd, 4th, 6th, 9th and 18th Defendants/Appellants. For Appellant Mrs. Ayo Obe - for the Plaintiffs/Respondents.Alao Aka-Bashorun (with him, Femi Falana) - for the 2nd, 7th, 10th, 11th, 12th and 18th Defendant/Respondents. Miss A.A, Akinseye - for the 13th Defendant/Respondents.K. Shomade - for the 14th Defendant/ Respondent.A. O. Omotosho - for the 15th Defendant/Respondent.E. Kudaya - for the 17th Defendant/Respondent. For Respondent
Other Citations:Elufioye v. Halilu (1990) 2 NWLR (Pt.130)

AWOGU, JCA (Delivering the Leading Judgment): Two interlocutory appeals have reached this court from the decisions of Adeniji, J., and Segun, J., in the above suit. The first, dated 5th December, 1988, was in respect of the discharge of an ex-parte order in favour of accelerated hearing. The second, dated 7th February, 1989, was, after Segun, J., took over, the refusal to dismiss the claim in limine for reasons given in the motion dated 19th December, 1988. Both judgments were to have been delivered together but for the request that the second appeal be heard by the full court in view of the conflicting decision of this court with regard to the Rule in Foss v. Harbottle (1843) 2 Hare 461. As a result, the appeal in respect of the discharge of the ex-parte injunction had to be disposed of earlier. The present judgment by the full court is in respect of the second appeal.

The plaintiffs and the defendants are members of National Union of Banks, Insurance and Financial Institutions Empl…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.