Customer Support

EMBALINKS TELECOM SERVICES LTD.
V.
CAL BANK LTD.

(2023) JELR 114274 (SC)

Supreme Court 22 Mar 2023 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- Supreme Court dismissed Plaintiff's appeal, upholding the Court of Appeal’s finding that Plaintiff remained indebted to the Bank and the loan agreement’s interest and penal clauses were not unconscionable, as Plaintiff freely contracted a

Case Details

Suit Number:J4/70/2022
Judges:BAFFOE-BONNIE JSC (PRESIDING), OWUSU (MS.) JSC, TORKORNOO (MRS.) JSC, ACKAH-YENSU (MS.) JSC, ASIEDU JSC
Counsel:E. K. AMUAH-SEKYI ESQ. FOR THE PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT/APPELLANT. NANA BEMA ADENU-MENSAH ESQ. FOR THE DEFENDANT/APPELLANT/APPELLANT.

JUDGMENT

ACKAH-YENSU (MS) JSC:-

INTRODUCTION

This appeal has arisen as a result of a dispute over the computation of the actual indebtedness of a customer to a bank.  Nowadays, it is not uncommon for debtors to seek the intervention of the courts to avoid valid transactions entered into with creditors.  The timing of such interventions, often during a default, is strategic with obvious motives. However, the courts cannot intervene unless there are vitiating circumstances like unconscionability, mistake, or fraud.

Indisputably, while borrowers are usually persons in great need and will often succumb to whatever terms of the agreement entered into with lenders, the law has carved a balancing mechanism to sustain the social significance of the bank-customer/borrower-lender relationship.  There are several occasions where the courts have opened up agreements entered into between a bank and its customer and reviewed or modified same for being unconscionable.  Other times, the courts find that …

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.