JUDGMENT
Ernst & Young LLP (the appellant herein) has filed this appeal against the judgment of Mativo, J dated 7th March 2017.
The appeal stems from a Constitutional Petition that had been filed at the High Court in Nairobi on 15th September 2016 by the appellant, seeking 14 declarations/orders as against the 1st respondent.
The Petition was heard by Mativo, J. who in a judgment delivered on 7th March 2017, declined to grant any of the reliefs sought in the Petition holding inter alia:
“As stated above, I find that the petitioner moved to court rather too early acting on apprehension, but as at that point in time, I find that the steps already taken by the 1st respondent are in conformity with the law and no breach of a fundamental right or threat had taken place or has been sufficiently proved. However, for avoidance of doubt, I declare that the first petitioner in the performance of its functions under the provisions of the Act is required to observe and accord persons under investigat…