Customer Support

FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA
V.
BARMINAS

(2017) JELR 53937 (SC)

Supreme Court 24 Feb 2017 Nigeria
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The respondent was tried and convicted for culpable homicide and armed robbery. - The prosecution relied heavily on the confessional statement of the accused, exhibit 1. - The Court of Appeal set aside the conviction and sentence, stating

Case Details

Suit Number:SC.369/2013
Judges:MARY UKAEGO PETER-ODILI JSC KUMAI BAYANG AKA’AHS JSC KUDIRAT MOTONMORI OLATOKUNBO KEKERE-EKUN JSC CHIMA CENTUS NWEZE JSC EJEMBI EKO JSC
Counsel:Chief F. F. Egele (with him, Bashir Tijjani Esq.) for the Appellant. Aliyu O. Saiki Esq. for the Respondent.

EKO JSC (Delivering the Lead Judgment): The respondent was tried and convicted for offences of culpable homicide punishable under section 221 of Penal Code and armed robberypunishable under section 298 of the Penal Code.

The trial was at the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja. The two charges he was tried and convicted for are:

  1. “That you, Gad Barminas (M) adult of Nyanyan Mobil Barracks, Abuja, on or about 25 May 2005, along Airport Road, Abuja in the Abuja Judicial Division, did cause the death of one Paul Ojo (deceased) by shooting him on the chest with a rifle knowing that death was the probable and not only a likely consequence of the act and thereby committed an offence contrary to section 298 of the Penal Code.
  2. That you, Gad Barminas (M) adult of Nyanyan Mobil Barracks, Abuja, on or about 25 May 2005 did commit an offence to wit: armed robbery against one Paul Ojo (deceased) by robbing him of a Toyota Car with registration No. XA 398 RBC, belonging to one Mr. Abbas…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.