J U D G M E N T
SOPHIA R. BERNASKO ESSAH (MRS) JA:
This is an appeal at the instance of the Plaintiff/Appellant, against the ruling of the High Court refusing to grant an Order of Mandamus against the Defendant /Respondent. The grounds are as follows:
- The High Court did not adequately consider the application for mandamus filed by the Plaintiff/Appellant and that occasioned a grave miscarriage of justice.
- The ruling is against the weight of evidence.
Although the Appellant indicated that further grounds may be filed upon receipt of the rulings, this was not to be.
In this delivery the Plaintiff/Appellant will be referred to as the Appellant whilst the Defendant/Respondent, the Respondent.
The background to this appeal is that on account of various acts of misconduct found to be in contravention of Section V1 (a) of the Conditions of Service of the Respondent’s Organization, the appointment of Appellant, a Principal Accounting Assistant, was terminated on 31st March, 2011. Reference page 69…