Customer Support

GEOFFREY M. ASANYO & 3 OTHERS
V.
ATTORNEY-GENERAL

(2020) JELR 97311 (SC)

Supreme Court 10 Jan 2020 Kenya
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The case involves a petition of appeal contesting the decision of the Court of Appeal. - The petitioners argue that the Court of Appeal's directions infringe on the doctrine of functus officio and contravene Article 163(7) of the Constitu

Case Details

Suit Number:Petition 7 of 2019
Judges:Jackton Boma Ojwang, Isaac Lenaola, Mohammed Khadhar Ibrahim, Smokin C Wanjala, Susanna Njoki Ndungu
Other Citations:Geoffrey M. Asanyo & 3 others v. Attorney-General [2020] eKLR

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

A. INTRODUCTION

[1] The Petition of appeal before the Court is filed under Article 163(4) (a) and (7) of the Constitution, contesting the decision of the Court of Appeal dated 22 January 2019. Principally, the petitioners contest the Court of Appeal’s directions, which required them to file a formal application seeking compliance with a Supreme Court Order, with the respondents being given a right of reply. They urge that the Court of Appeal’s directions infringe on the doctrine of functus officio, in that they amount to a re-opening of litigation on a matter that has been heard with finality. The petitioners contend, further, that the Court of Appeal’s directions contravene Article 163(7) of the Constitution, which requires all other Courts to comply with the decisions of the Supreme Court.

B. BACKGROUND

[2] This is not the first time the matter is being brought before this Court. The Petitioners herein had previously filed in this Court Petition No. 21 of 2015 ? ch…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.