Customer Support

GTB
V.
TAFIDA & ANOR

(2021) JELR 109296 (CA)

Court of Appeal 8 Oct 2021 Nigeria
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- This case involves a garnishee order absolute granted by the High Court of Kaduna State in Nigeria. - The judgment creditor obtained a judgment against the judgment debtor and commenced garnishee proceedings against several commercial ban

Case Details

Suit Number:CA/K/281/2017
Judges:Fatima Omoro Akinbami, JCA Abubakar Mahmud Talba, JCA Peter Oyinkenimiemi Affen, JCA
Counsel:T. Okitikpi, Esq. For the Appellant; Kabir Momoh, Esq. for the 1st Respondent; 2nd Respondent absent and unrepresented by counsel.

PETER OYINKENIMIEMI AFFEN, J.C.A. (Delivering the Leading Judgment): 

Introduction

The relative convenience and efficacy of garnishee proceedings as a process of enforcing monetary judgments commend it as the option of first resort for judgment creditors and their legal counsel. But the severely limited scope of garnishee proceedings is the subject of a great deal of misapprehension, and its attractiveness is fast becoming its bane in Nigerian jurisprudence. This appeal stems from a garnishee order absolute granted by the High Court of Kaduna State (Coram: David Wyoms, J.) on 12th July 2016 in Suit No. KDH/KAD/188/08: Engr. Musa Bamanga Tafida v. Arch. Dewu Mohammed. The 1st Respondent herein [Engr. Musa Bamaga Tafida], having obtained judgment in the sum of N35,000,000.00 (Thirty Five Million Naira) against the 2nd Respondent [Arch. Dewu Mohammed], commenced garnishee proceedings against nineteen (19) commercial banks, including the Appellant [Guaranty Trust Bank] as 13th Garnishee. In…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.