Customer Support

HAYFORD
V.
ANSAH AND OTHERS

(1991) JELR 66093 (HC)

High Court 31 Jul 1991 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The plaintiff was awarded judgment against the defendants for defamation, with damages of ¢2 million and costs of ¢200,000. - The defendants did not react to the plaintiff's amendment of the statement of claim, so they were deemed to rely

Case Details

Judges:PIESARE J.
Counsel:TSAHEY FOR THE PLAINTIFF; MISS AKUA ASABEA AYISI FOR THE SECOND DEFENDANT., NO REPRESENTATION BY OR FOR THE FIRST AND THIRD DEFENDANTS.

PIESARE J.: On 31 July 1991 this court being fully satisfied upon the evidence and upon the law that the plaintiff was entitled to judgment against the defendants for defamation, entered judgment against them jointly and severally for the sum of ¢2 million damages for defamation, plus ¢200,000 costs.

The following are the reasons for this judgment against the defendants. The claim against the defendants jointly and severally was for the sum of ¢2,700,000 for the defamatory words published against the plaintiff by the defendants in the Ghanaian Voice issue No. 131 of 11 - 17 November 1985.

The original writ of summons and the original statement of claim were filed the same day on 8 January 1986. After a series of amendments, the statement of claim was finally amended by the plaintiff pursuant to an order of the court dated 21 July 1989. The defendants did not react to the plaintiff’s final amendment by filing any amended defence or defences.

Now Order 28, r. 5 of the High Court (Civil Pro…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.