Customer Support

IDDI DAGOMBA
V.
THE STATE

(1961) JELR 67624 (SC)

Supreme Court 17 Feb 1961 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The learned trial judge did not adequately consider matters of extreme provocation in this appeal. - The judge disbelieved the appellant's story that he had the weapon on him at the time of the assault and battery committed on him by the

Case Details

Judges:VAN LARE JSC, SARKODEE-ADOO JSC, AKIWUMI J.S.C.
Counsel:B. K. TAMAKLOE FOR THE APPELLANT; K. DUA SAKYI FOR THE RESPONDENT (THE STATE).

VAN LARE J.S.C.: Van Lare, J.S.C. delivered the Judgment of the court. We are of the opinion that in this appeal the learned trial judge did not adequately consider the question of matters of extreme provocation to which the prosecution witnesses have testified. The learned judge disbelieving the story of the appellant that he had the weapon on him at the time of the violent assault and battery committed on him by the deceased, failed to consider adequately the question of the effect of provocation on the prisoner when, as he found, the prisoner went to his house and fetched the knife. The judge has omitted to find that the prisoner had cooled down or that at the time the prisoner fetched the knife from his house he had murderous intent.

We think, however, that on the evidence as a whole the prisoner might have been still labouring under the violent and extreme provocation caused him by the deceased and that when he went out to attack the deceased, he was still deprived of the power of…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.