IGE
V.
AKINYEMI

(1990) JELR 79408 (CA)

Court of Appeal · 12 Sep 1990 · Nigeria
·

Other Citations

Ige v. Akinyemi (1990) 6 NWLR (Pt. 158) 547

CORAM

ADENEKAN ADEMOLA, J.C.A. (Presided), BOLARINWA OYEGOKE BABALAKIN, J.C.A., FRANCIS OLISA AWOGU, J.C.A. (Read the Leading Judgment)

Core Terms ^Beta

plaintiff

defendants

appellants

respondents

plaintiffs

defendant

necessary parties

muritala olosunde

power of attorney

trial judge

exhibits jb1

joinder of the interveners

said land

further counter-affidavit

issue of estoppel

learned trial judge

order of joinder

set aside

statement of claim

5th appellant

added plaintiffs

aforesaid land

area of land

attorneys of osunba

court judgment order

deed of conveyance exhibit jb5

exclusion of the defendants

exhibit jb1

following grounds of appeal

following issues

following terms

further acts of trespass

issue estoppel

leading judgment

oral hearing

order of injunction

owners of the said area of land

part of the aforesaid land

plan no. ogek

possession of any portion of the land subject-matter

possession of the said land

respect of any portion of igando land

result of the defendants

square metres

such legal action

supreme court judgment

trial of this case

way of counter-claim

withdrawal of the defendants

AWOGU, J.C.A. (Delivering the Leading Judgment): This is an appeal against the ruling of Olugbani, J., of Ikeja Judicial Division of the High Court of Lagos delivered on April 14, 1987, granting leave to the interveners/respondents to be joined as co-plaintiffs in the suit as well as joining one Muritala Olosunde as a co-defendant. The plaintiff in the suit sued the appellants claiming: -

"1.Declaration that the plaintiff is entitled to the use and occupationto the exclusion of the defendants and their agents of all that area of land described in Plan No. OGEK.894B/77 measuring 7779.883 square metres situate lying and being at Ignado Village which is more described on Plan No.OGEK/894B/77 (a copy of which is attached herewith and marked Annexture A).

2.Perpetual injunction restraining the defendants their servants and agents from further acts of trespass on the aforesaid land described in Annexture A.

3.Damages suffered by the plaintiff as a result of the defendants' trespass to part of …

IGE V. AKINYEMI

IGE
V.
AKINYEMI