Customer Support

IPALIBO
V.
STATE

(2014) JELR 39855 (CA)

Court of Appeal 31 Jan 2014 Nigeria
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The appellant and another person were convicted of rape and assault occasioning harm. - The charge of rape lacked necessary particulars and did not state the material time of the alleged rape. - The duty of the prosecution is to establish

Case Details

Suit Number:CA/PH/8CR/2013
Judges:EJEMBI EKO Justice of The Court of Appeal of Nigeria MODUPE FASANMI Justice of The Court of Appeal of Nigeria STEPHEN JONAH ADAH Justice of The Court of Appeal of Nigeria
Counsel:O. J. Irerhime Esq. For Appellant C.B. Ekeh, Esq. Senior State Counsel with Mrs. I. Wokocha Senior State Counsel both ofRivers State Ministry of Justice For Respondent

EJEMBI EKO, JCA (Delivering the Leading Judgment): On 28th January, 2013 the High Court of Rivers state holden at Bori convicted the appellant and one Yorkpara Augustine for the offence of rape contrary to Section 358 of the Criminal Code Cap 37, Vol. 2, Laws of Rivers state of Nigeria, 1999. Mr. Yorkpara Augustine was separately charged and convicted for assault occasioning harm contrary to Section 355 of the said Criminal Code of Rivers State. The rape was allegedly committed on 11th March, 2008 at 20 Kogam Bori that has several apartments or flats. The charge does not state the material time the rape was allegedly committed.

The statement and the particulars of the offence of rape for which the appellant and Yorkpara Augustine were charged, convicted and sentenced read thus -

STATEMENT OF OFFENCE: COUNT 1

RAPE-contrary to Section 358 of the Criminal Code (Cap. 37 Vol. 2, Laws of Rivers State of Nigeria, 1999)

PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE

DAGOGO HARRY IPALIBO and YORKPARA AUGUSTINE on the…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.