JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
[1] The appellant was convicted by the trial court on his own plea of guilty to a charge of defilement contrary to section 8(1) and (3) of the Sexual Offences Act, 2006 and sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment. The appellant had defiled a child aged 13 years.
That notwithstanding, the appellant preferred an appeal to the High Court (D. S. Majanja, J.) against the conviction and sentence. His appeal was however unsuccessful.
[2] The appellant preferred a second appeal to this Court. In his self-drawn memorandum of appeal, the appellant alleged that the age of the complainant was not proved; that the doctor who filled the P3 form was not called to testify; and that the sentence was quite severe, considering that he was barely 18 years old at the time he was convicted and sentenced.
[3] When the appeal came up for hearing, the appellant relied on his one page written submissions that he briefly highlighted.
[4] Mr. Kakoi, learned Principal Prosecution Counsel, opposed the…