Customer Support

JASBIR SINGH RAI & 3 OTHERS
V.
TARLOCHAN SINGH RAI & 4 OTHERS

(2007) JELR 101356 (CA)

Court of Appeal 7 Dec 2007 Kenya
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

Get an AI-generated summary of this case.

Case Details

Suit Number:Civil Appli. Nai 307 of 2003 (154/2003 UR)
Judges:Riaga Samuel Cornelius Omolo JA Samuel Elikana Ondari Bosire JA Philip Nyamu Waki JA Erastus Mwaniki Githinji JA William Shirley Deverell JA
Location:Nairobi
Other Citations:JASBIR SINGH RAI & 3 others v. TARLOCHAN SINGH RAI & 4 others [2007] eKLR

RULING OF OMOLO, JA

I must start this Ruling by pointing out that two conflicting principles, both of great importance to those who seek the decisions of the courts on various issues, are involved in the decision we are called upon to make in the application before us. Those two principles are:-

1. That there ought to and must be an end to litigation; and

2. That justice must be done and be seen to have been done in each case that comes before the courts for determination.

The courts in the Commonwealth have readily recognized that the two principles must somehow be harmonized in each particular litigation in which their application is brought into issue. In TAYLOR and ANOTHER v. LAWRENCE and ANOTHER [2002] 2 ALL E.R. 353, the Lord Chief Justice Woolf, tracing the origins of the two principles, cited the speech of Lord Wilberforce in AMPTHILL PEERAGE CASE [1976] 2 ALL E.R. 411 and there Lord Wilberforce is recorded as saying:-

“English law, and it is safe to say, all comparable systems, p…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.