Customer Support

JOMO KENYATTA & 5 OTHERS
V.
REGINA

(1954) JELR 105162 (SC)

Supreme Court 15 Jan 1954 Kenya
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The court concludes that the consent of the Governor was necessary for the prosecutions under Section 70 and 71 of the Penal Code, and that the consent given by the Member for Law and Order was valid. - The court finds that the consents g

Case Details

Suit Number:Criminal Appeal 276, 277, 278, 279, 280 & 281 of 1953
Judges:Geoffrey Burkitt Whitecomb Rudd
Other Citations:Jomo Kenyatta & 5 others v. Regina [1954] eKLR

JUDGMENT

These six Appeals have been consolidated. The Appellants appeal from convictions under Section 71 of the Penal Code of being members of an unlawful Society, namely the Mau Mau Society and of convictions under Section 70 of the Penal Code of managing or assisting in the management of the same unlawful Society. Under Section 72 of the Penal Code, a prosecution for either of these offences shall not be instituted without the consent of the Governor. The subsequent amendment to this section rendering such consent unnecessary in the case of the Mau Mau Society did not apply to these prosecutions, as it was enacted subsequently.

The first point taken by the Appellants is that there was no consent to the prosecutions by the Governor. It is admitted, however, that prosecutions of the Appellants for offences under these sections were consented to by the Member for Law and Order acting for the Governor under a purported delegation to the Member by the Governor of his power to give such c…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.